<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.2" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Pioneer VSX-82TXS Receiver</title>
	<link>http://www.htblog.net/2006-10-31/pioneer-vsx-82txs-receiver/</link>
	<description>Home Theater Blog</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 03:37:22 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.2</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Steve</title>
		<link>http://www.htblog.net/2006-10-31/pioneer-vsx-82txs-receiver/#comment-1001</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Nov 2006 18:02:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.htblog.net/2006-10-31/pioneer-vsx-82txs-receiver/#comment-1001</guid>
					<description>Perhaps I was a little unclear in my last rant!  I'm not trying to discourage anyone from looking at ampli-tuners (also called &quot;receivers&quot; in some languages, for bizarre reasons).  I only have two complaints: one, they are mis-named in this particular language, and two, there is no such thing on the market as an A/V integrated surround amplifier.  Of course those of us not in the business of manufacturing A/V gear cannot do anything about that second problem, but we can do something about the first!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Perhaps I was a little unclear in my last rant!  I&#8217;m not trying to discourage anyone from looking at ampli-tuners (also called &#8220;receivers&#8221; in some languages, for bizarre reasons).  I only have two complaints: one, they are mis-named in this particular language, and two, there is no such thing on the market as an A/V integrated surround amplifier.  Of course those of us not in the business of manufacturing A/V gear cannot do anything about that second problem, but we can do something about the first!
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
